This Fraud is multilayered and I still do not
know how deep the rabbit hole goes in all this, but I will share with you what
I know so far. The Royal Family fought with the BBC for a long time over
televising the Coronation Oath, the wanted it to remain a Private matter.
The finally agreed after a poll was taken saying that 78% of the British people
wanted to see it televised.
is a research document that tells the tail from the
UK Parliament. They say in it that there is a “Slight” difference between
the oath that Queen took and the Oath that was the Statutory
requirement. The required Oath by Law is Appendix A and Oath she took is
in Appendix B.
On her way to the Coronation, Her Majesty wore the George IV State Diadem - the
crown depicted on stamps. Made in 1820, the Diadem features roses, shamrocks
and thistles with 1,333 diamonds and 169 pearls.
is interesting because she was wearing a crown prior to her Coronation.
You will not the play on numbers with the 13 and the 33 along with the 69
expression in the numbers, as above so bellow. Crowns are full of
symbolism that point too the rule of the Egyptian
Pharaohs and the Ancient Mystery School beliefs. This is a rabbit hole
that goes very deep.
She is presented to the “People” as Queen
Elizabeth II to be accepted by the People. She has not been crowned as
yet and could not be called Queen Elizabeth II until she is actually
crowned. The people in the “Congregation” accept her as their Queen, but
there is no Question asked if anyone does not accept her. This is
Contract Law, without the opposing vote, there is no vote. Take for
example how Parliament works; votes are for nay or yeah. Keep in mind
from here on all about Contract Law. She may have the right to ascend by
Law, but it is all about Law.
She is presented to the People as Your “Undoubted Queen” as But is not addressed as Queen
Elizabeth II, just Queen Elizabeth. Not sure if that really matters
though. But here the Archbishop is saying that she is already the Queen,
not the Queen in waiting. Prime Minsters are
called Prime Ministers Elect before their Oath or example. The
Congregation was made up with many leaders from all over the Commonwealth and
world, 125 countries in all. They were agreeing on behalf of the people
of there Countries.
Now the problem with this is of course, she has
been accepted by the people as Queen Elizabeth, without giving her Oath, which
was likely added in. So at this point it matters not what Oath she
actually signs or agrees too, because she has been accepted unconditionally by
I would just add that I thought she could hardly
contain herself, thought her curtsy was going to turn into a jump for joy with
a heels tapping.
The Arch Bishop bows to her. This is
breaking God’s commandment thou shall have no other Gods before me. He
begins to administer the Oath, recognizing her authority over him in doing so.
The Arch Bishop askes
her: Madam, is your Majesty willing to take
Of course now she is called Madam now after they
call her Queen so that Queen Elizabeth does not take the Oath, the madam’s
Majesty does, which is not defined here. This was not part of the Legal
Oath by Parliamentary Statute, see Appendix A. Who is actually taking the
Oath here? Who exactly is your Majesty? It is bait and switch.
Now she goes about listening to the oath being
read and says I am willing, this is all per the proper Oath. This part of
the Oath deals with her willingness to take on the rulership
of the UK and the Commonwealth. Of course she agrees to that!
You will see on the Robe of the Arch Bishop the Templars Cross with a circle in the middle. This is a
flattened down pyramid. The circle is the flattened down earth, which
represents their domination over all the earth, not God’s.
Now the commentator calls her the Queen not
Elizabeth as she has still not finished taking the Oath. Further watch
very carefully where she signs the book, “Form of Oath”. Under Contract
Law one must sign their contracts at the bottom of a page accepting all what
was written above. She signs on a blank page at the top adjacent to the
form of Oath. At 6:55 you can clearly see the Oath on the left page and
she is signing at the top of right page. Further she is signing the Oath
prior to all of the Oath being read and her verbally
agreeing to it.
Coronation Oath The basis for the coronation oath, which forms part of the
coronation ceremony, is enshrined in statute in the Coronation Oath Act 1689.9 This Act required the King William and Queen Mary, as
joint monarchs, to swear an oath during the coronation ceremony. The Act
of Settlement 1701 and the Accession Declaration Act 1910 make a statutory
requirement on the monarch to take the coronation oath.10
worth noting that the coronation oath has been modified without statutory
authority. The present Queen swore a slightly different version of the oath to
the 1689 version. It still included a promise to maintain the established
Protestant religion in the United Kingdom. The text of the oath taken by
Elizabeth II in 1953 is also appended to this note.
She is presented with the Bible.
You will notice the Cube on the front of the
Bible. It is not the King James Bible 1611 Edition upon which is what is
suppose to be used in her Courts I believe. If you look again at the
Lawful Oath in Appendix A, the Oath is administered and the King and Queen have
the Bible before them at the beginning the Oath and lay their hand end of their
oath swearing upon it. I checked the website for the Church of England,
but could not directly find any information on which Bible’s are currently accepted
although Quroa found it when I asked Siri on my iPhone. There is
no mention of this Bible being used by the Church of England. The Bible
as the Holy Gospel in the great Bible as per page 8 of the Coronation Oath
document put out by the UK Parliament PDF I have been referring too.
Now in both the black and white and color
version of the Coronation the YouTube video cuts out to where she is being
Anointed and Crowned as Queen. There is no public record of this part of
the Oath readily available to the Public and thus why?
There was no requirement for her to sign the
first part of the Oath in the book, she was to complete the entire Oath and no
signing of the Oath was required by Statutory law, from what I see, although it
may have been a requirement, just haven’t dug down that deep yet. If you
reference Appendix A you will see there is no break mentioned. So all she
agrees to here publicly is to rule over the UK and Commonwealth, without any
restrictions to her power to do so.
The next part of the Oath deals with ensuring
that the Commonwealth remain Christian and extending God’s rights and freedoms
to the people of the UK and Commonwealth, which would make the Holy Bible the
supreme law of the land. Poof!
Interesting Pakistan was formed into a Islamic Country in 1947 under King George, so this may go
back to Queen Victoria or further. Because the Coronation Oaths are kept
secret from the Public at large, only those who bear true allegiance to her
Majesty via oath of Office, are ever allowed to be present during her
Coronation I suspect. And of course the Royals all decked out in
expensive crowns and jewelry etc.
The Anointing of the Queen is suppose
to be done with Olive Oil as per passages in the Bible with King David
etc. Just do a search anointing in the Bible and you will see. Further God is not a Respector
of Persons and Her Majesty is indeed a Person. It was completely unlawful
under God’s Laws and ways what transpired here.
So that is the basics. I know you are very
astute and much more knowledgeable than I am, which is
why I offered to share this with you. I hope it failed the smell test at
If you compare the rest of the Oaths in Appendix
A and B, you will see that she only agrees to keep the UK a Protestant Nation,
not the rest of the Commonwealth. She is suppose to have taken on the
title Defender of the Faith, thus every minister in her Government must
preserve Christianity within their Countries and prevent any incursions from
Her Accession Oath was also invalid.
The oath Elizabeth took left out
,"of my Realm". Thus
the oath is completely bogus and she was not entitled by law to be called
To further go down the Rabbit Hole you need to
look at the information that Canada and probably every other Country in the
Commonwealth are actually Corporations acting as Governments under Admiralty
Law, not God’s Law as the Oath pertains too. The Canada’s People Union is
doing some work in this area to try and wrestle back control of Canada from the
Criminals that usurped God’s authority over the earth.
The Canadian’s People’s Union
They have some YouTube videos as well that are
informative. But they don’t go into the Queen’s Oath at all.
They have a lot of things right, but they are not
aware of what I have just shared with you. Further they are doing this
from a Legal perspective, not God’s Perspective, which is why they are bound to
In Genesis 1:26-28 God gives man dominion over
all the earth. That has never changed and no one can take it away from us
under God. However what is going on is not about God it is about
So what has transpired is that the Queen has a
pure dictatorship with no legal requirement to extend rights to the People she