To: The private men, Michel Dorais ,John McCallum, and Guiliano Zaccardelli pictured above in order and acting as the Canadan commissioner of Revenue, The Canadian Minister of Revenue and the Canadian Commissioner of the R.C.M.P.
,
Hello gentlemen I am_______________________________________________, an officiating minister of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International. I wish you to be aware that it is a violation of my faith to bow to men and women acting as de facto gods, being the de facto governments of man creating law in addition to God’s laws and in derogation to his law. This is especialy true when it applies to men and women who have no understanding of the established and in force law regarding their oaths of allegiance to the Christian monarch her Majesty the Queen.
As a result of my unavoidable awareness of corruption within the police, judiciary, and various political bodies of this country I am, as of my duty to defend my Christian faith, and in an official performance of a function of my calling, compelled to demand of you the private men, true certified copies of your oath’s of allegiance, to prove to me, in my ministerial function, that you understand the true meaning of your oaths in law.
It is agreed that I make these demands in quest of honor and upholding God’s law.
It is agreed that I am perfroming a function of my calling as a Christian minister in defense of the faith in making this ministerial demand that you deliver to me the meaning of the law, regarding your oath, that is still in force.
It is agreed that the facts will be evident that you are not competent to practice law enforce law or collect taxes if you do not know the true, in law, meaning of your oath.
It is agreed that no man or woman can be competent to practice law or collect taxes if they do not know or refuse to offer the law and definition thereof regarding their own oaths.
Please deliver to me your honor in your intent to uphold your lawful oath as defined in law.
It is agreed by you that one who takes an oath to be truly allegiant to a Christian monarch to get the job and does not know what their oath in active law means when asked, is indicating they are incompetent as they lied or were foolish when they said they would be faithful and bear true allegaince. Can you provide true allegaince if you do not know what it is? This is evidense of eiher incompetence or perjury in obtaining official status by a deception, and is also known as fraud.
Exodus 20:3-5 Leviticus 6:2
It is agreed by you that you will uphold your oath to support and aid her majesty to defend the law of the King James Bible
as the rule of Law defended by the anointed of God Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor. It is agreed by you that you
honor your oath as an act of religious worship.
I look forward to your simple agreement and acceptance of this privately offered covenant via your good faith tacit consent of failing to rebut the agreed upon terms with a private reply.
It is agreed that youa re aware and know that if you do not reply privately you will be advising me as God’s minister, and the members of our faith who will witness this, of your total agreement wih all of the terms offered and that you will act as my witness to that fact should I need you to give evidense.
It is agreed that failure to reply will also be taken as proof positive, with no possible rebuttal, of your agreement with me. It It is agreed that the private men and women who act as her majesty’s officers are accomplice and party to the enforcement of taxation with de facto law, and have no public authority from her Majesty the Queen to intimidate and extort men and women of Christian faith to violate their faith.
It isa greed that the failure to rebut and dispute this good faith agreement will mean in submission and understanding, by all parties to this private notice, that we have a good faith covenant of terms as indicated above and that the Authorized King James Bible is the Supreme rule of law with uncontested standing in the British Commonwealth and no intimidation by any man or woman to violate it’s commands can be possibly seen as lawful.
Please get my name and general delivery correct as you cannot falsify them for a financial purpose without my consent or fulll knowledge as to what your purpose was, and as of my faith I cannot accept legal fictions applied to me or accept postal coded mail. I will, in two weeks, if you choose to tacitly accept my position and agree, be sending confirmation of our agreement witnessed by three members of the Church to ensure honor is present. Upon your acceptance of the final covenant of terms we will be, in ecclesiastical duty, posting and advertising our mutually beneficial agreement to all sources pertinent to this situation of faith. Matthew 18:15-20
It is agreed that any and all attempts by your de facto incompetent associates to continue this intimidation and violation of our faiths freedoms will be seen as proof and evidence of your mens rea or to be clear guilty mind. Treason is also a descriptive term that is used. I intend to stand in my faith regardless of your de facto attempt to intimidate me, should that be your private choice, as you will have no public protection from de facto incompetent lawyers as they are in conflict. You may wish to refer to the RonCarelli v Duplessis Decision of 1959. He lost. Ezekiel 33:6
I look forward to your agreement in remembrance of Section 22 from the in force law of the Westminster Confession of Faith from 1646.
Do not assume you have any true authority to intimidate me to accept any de facto process.
Blessings
Minister: ____________________________________
Print name ____________________________________
Address _____________________________________ _____________________________________
Witnesses _____________________________________ _____________________________________
Date _____________________________________